<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Content Operations on The Bottleneck Founder</title><link>https://thebottleneckfounder.com/categories/content-operations/</link><description>Recent content in Content Operations on The Bottleneck Founder</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thebottleneckfounder.com/categories/content-operations/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>My editor keeps missing the brand style and it takes endless revisions — is this normal or a bad hire?</title><link>https://thebottleneckfounder.com/my-editor-keeps-missing-the-brand-style-and-it-takes-endless-revisions-is-this-normal-or-a-bad-hire/</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thebottleneckfounder.com/my-editor-keeps-missing-the-brand-style-and-it-takes-endless-revisions-is-this-normal-or-a-bad-hire/</guid><description>&lt;p>Some back-and-forth with an editor is normal. &lt;strong>Endless revisions are not automatically proof of a bad hire, though — they are often evidence that the creative system is asking the editor to guess.&lt;/strong> Before replacing the person, tighten the brief, style references, approval chain, and definition of “done,” then see whether the revision count drops.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="first-separate-an-editor-problem-from-a-process-problem">First separate an editor problem from a process problem&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>An editor cannot reliably hit a style that exists only in your head.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Does anyone have content/marketing SOPs already built out to share — we're at $25k+/mo and drowning in task management?</title><link>https://thebottleneckfounder.com/does-anyone-have-content-marketing-sops-already-built-out-to-share-were-at-25k-mo-and-drowning-in-task-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thebottleneckfounder.com/does-anyone-have-content-marketing-sops-already-built-out-to-share-were-at-25k-mo-and-drowning-in-task-management/</guid><description>&lt;p>You probably do not need someone else&amp;rsquo;s giant SOP library. &lt;strong>At $25k+/month, start with the handoffs that are already causing rework — sales, onboarding, content production, approvals, revisions, and delivery — and document each one with a trigger, owner, required inputs, steps, quality check, approval rule, and definition of done.&lt;/strong> The best SOP is the smallest document that lets another competent person repeat the result without asking you what happens next.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>I hand raw footage to an editor and the final never matches my voice/brand — how do I delegate without losing what makes it mine?</title><link>https://thebottleneckfounder.com/i-hand-raw-footage-to-an-editor-and-the-final-never-matches-my-voice-brand-how-do-i-delegate-without-losing-what-makes-it-mine/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thebottleneckfounder.com/i-hand-raw-footage-to-an-editor-and-the-final-never-matches-my-voice-brand-how-do-i-delegate-without-losing-what-makes-it-mine/</guid><description>&lt;p>Raw footage is not enough to transfer your taste. &lt;strong>If an editor repeatedly delivers something that feels like another creator&amp;rsquo;s channel, delegate with a style system: audience context, 2–3 strong references, annotated examples, visual rules, non-negotiables, and feedback that explains &lt;em>why&lt;/em> something feels wrong.&lt;/strong> You should keep authorship and judgment without personally making every cut.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="the-missing-handoff-is-usually-taste">The missing handoff is usually taste&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Founders often think they delegated editing when they sent a Drive folder and a sentence like “make this engaging.” Technically, the editor has the footage. Creatively, they are still guessing.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>